A Serverless Perspective on Building Teams - by Zach Philips-Gary
As a CTO, you're constantly making strategic decisions that impact your organization's technological capabilities and operational efficiency. Two parallel choices consistently emerge: whether to build or buy solutions, and whether to hire full-time employees or engage consultants.
Conventional wisdom draws a straightforward parallel: building in-house is like hiring FTEs, while buying solutions resembles engaging consultants. However, this perspective misses a more nuanced and powerful analogy that better reflects today's dynamic business environment.
The Serverless Workforce: Contractors as On-Demand Resources
With the right contractors, the FTE vs. consultant decision resembles choosing between traditional infrastructure and serverless computing models. Just as AWS Lambda or Google Cloud Run provide on-demand computing resources that scale instantly with your needs, skilled contractors offer a similar form of operational elasticity for your human capital.
Consider how this comparison plays out in practice. Serverless technologies allow you to pay only for the compute resources you actually use, with costs that scale up or down with demand. In the same way, contractors enable you to scale your team’s capacity precisely when needed, without carrying excess capacity during slower periods.
This principle extends to expertise as well. Serverless platforms provide immediate access to specialized infrastructure without requiring you to become an expert in hardware management. Similarly, contractors offer specialized expertise you can tap into precisely when needed, without having to develop and maintain those capabilities in-house.
The operational benefits are also clear. Serverless eliminates infrastructure management concerns like patching and capacity planning. Contractors offer a similar advantage by reducing HR overhead, benefits administration, and long-term career development responsibilities.
There are resilience benefits in both models too. Cloud-native architectures built on serverless components often demonstrate greater resilience through their distributed nature. In the same way, a strategically assembled contractor network helps mitigate risks related to key person dependencies and skill gaps.
Economic Elasticity in Uncertain Times
In today’s unpredictable economic climate, this kind of flexibility becomes a strategic advantage. Converting fixed personnel costs to variable expenses provides financial freedom, crucial during economic downturns or sudden market shifts. This mirrors how serverless computing turns fixed infrastructure costs into variable operational expenses.
Adaptability is a key factor here. Just as serverless allows the instant deployment of new capabilities, contractors can rapidly bring new skills into your organization as market requirements change. This quick access to expertise can be a significant competitive advantage when conditions shift unexpectedly.
Economic uncertainty also increases the risk of hiring permanent staff who may become redundant if the business landscape changes. A contractor-heavy strategy reduces this risk, similar to how serverless computing minimizes the risk of over-provisioning infrastructure.
By reducing fixed overhead in non-core areas, both serverless architectures and strategic contractor engagement allow you to focus permanent investments on your core differentiators.
One of the most valuable aspects of this approach is access to specialized skills that would be impractical to maintain in-house. Emerging technologies, niche frameworks, or cutting-edge methodologies often come with high salary demands in the full-time market, making them costly for skills needed only occasionally. For instance, a fintech company might need an AI specialist to explore applications of LLMs in customer support workflows, but that expertise would likely go unused most of the time if hired full-time. Similarly, implementing a complex data transformation might require a specialist in a specific ETL tool who would have limited ongoing contributions after the project is completed.
Hiring specialists as consultants provides a form of “market rate insurance” against the rapidly changing technology landscape. Instead of investing heavily in training or hiring for niche skills that may soon be obsolete, consultant relationships let you access the expertise you need only when it’s actually valuable.
Strategic use of specialized consultants can also enhance your internal capabilities when managed properly. By pairing consultants with FTEs during specific projects and setting clear knowledge transfer goals, you gain both immediate specialized capabilities and long-term skill development. This approach is similar to using managed services temporarily while building internal cloud expertise.
The Hybrid Reality: Balancing Full-Time Staff and Consultants
Most forward-thinking CTOs recognize that the optimal approach involves a thoughtful blend of resources. A core team of FTEs, focused on your organization’s competitive differentiators, augmented by a flexible layer of specialized contractors, often provides the best balance of stability and adaptability.
This hybrid model mirrors modern cloud infrastructure designs that combine dedicated resources for predictable workloads with serverless components for variable or specialized needs. Both approaches offer the benefits of ownership where it matters most while providing elasticity where requirements fluctuate.
We’ve seen firsthand how this mix of FTEs and specialized contractors helps organizations navigate technology transitions more smoothly. Your permanent team maintains continuity and core knowledge, while specialized consultants bring fresh perspectives and targeted expertise exactly when you need it.
By partnering with Jinka, you gain access to a flexible talent network that functions much like a serverless platform for specialized skills. You can rapidly scale up capabilities for key initiatives and then return to your core team as projects complete. This approach not only delivers cost efficiency but also fosters a more responsive and resilient technical foundation.
This is the true promise of the serverless workforce model: not just saving costs, but building a dynamic, adaptable approach to technical capability in an increasingly unpredictable business environment.